Major revision springer. One month later, major revision was suggested.

Major revision springer I then resubmitted the paper a month later. Nov 21, 2023 · Revision in scholarly writing should not be confused with proofreading. But from the Elsevier's tracking feature, I noticed one reviewer finished their review within 2 days of accepting the invitation. Then I re-submitted the revised form. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. trueI submitted a paper to Elsevier. springernature. 2. section Article Types applies to all contributions submitted for a Topical Issue and concerns scientific level and novelty as well . (major revision) Springer, 2012 Variable Ordering for the Application of BDDs to the Maximum Independent Set Problem Proceedings of CPAIOR (author (s): David Bergman, Andre Cire, Willem-Jan Van Hoeve, John Hooker) Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7298, 2012; 34-49 Common Reasons for Getting A “Major Revision” Decision The most common reason for a manuscript to receive a major revision decision is that, while the topic is of interest and relevant to readers of the journal, the editors are unable to determine, from the existing version of the paper, whether the quality is sufficient for dissemination. Such claims are, most commonly, based on anecdotal evidence. I was invited to review a journal paper for the first time but have some slight confusion on what should lead to a major/minor revision decision. ' Aug 14, 2019 · コメントと、かなり丁寧。 だが、「2回major revisionが続くとrejectという方針」らしく、結果はreje ct。 しかし今回も「直したらまた出して良いよ」とい う注釈付き。 それじゃmajor revisionと同じでは? という疑念を抱きながらも、再 びrevisionに取り組む。 Jan 21, 2025 · Thank you once again for this opportunity, and I look forward to submitting the revised manuscript soon. After revision, two reviewer accept, one has concern, then minor revision. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? Mar 20, 2022 · The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. The various status updates are as follows. Then, I have made all the necessary Oct 28, 2024 · By meticulously addressing reviewer feedback and adhering to the revision standards, authors can significantly improve the chances of a successful review and expedite the publication process. Sample Timeline (One-Month Revision Period) This book provides insights and very useful information into important issues in acetabular revision hip surgery procedures and complications in light of challenging major defects caused by trauma, tumor, or infection such as osteomyelitis and is a useful references for orthopedic surgeons. Should I worry about manuscript rejection? Thanks Jun 7, 2023 · If i miss the deadline for submitting revisions, do I still have the opportunity to resubmit the original manuscript to the journal? Jan 14, 2020 · If it has passed editorial assessment than the research article has some scope which is required by the journal. September 15: I received a major revision recommendation. The most common editor decisions are “accept,” “minor revision,” “major revision,” and “reject. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. Keep in mind that revisions and improvement are part of the publication process and actually help raise the quality of your manuscript GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS The report form consists of FOUR different parts that allow for communicating your review: 1) OVERALL RECOMMENDATION: a) Acceptable without revision: This option meaning 'publish as is' does usually apply after revision only. One reviewer suggested minor corrections and one reviewer suggested major corrections. Read this article to know more After you submit a review you should receive a notification that the review was successfully received. However, in the tracking site it displayed 'Major Revision' probably as a norm - though frankly there was nothing major in the suggested revisions and both reviewers actually used the term 'minor' in their reports ! It took us no more than two days to do all suggested changes and According to editor guideline on springer website "Accept with minor revisions is actually a commitment to ultimately publish the paper, provided the authors answer the remaining concerns (which sh Nov 20, 2024 · For additional information, please check our peer review policies for Springer, BMC and Nature portfolio or visit the respective journal website. I don't know what has happened. “Major” revisions by contrast usually involve doing new statistical analyses, replacing figures and tables, rewriting entire parts of the paper to include new content In my field (Linguistics), it's getting rare and rare to get "accepted with minor/major revision". Jul 10, 2016 · Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. Wiley, 2012; 388-407 Integrated Methods for Optimization, 2nd ed. May 14, 2015 · I submitted by math paper to an Elsevier journal around 6 months ago. Jun 15, 2023 · A frequent complaint of editors of scientific journals is that it has become increasingly difficult to find reviewers for evaluating submitted manuscripts. Mar 14, 2018 · First, I cover some background about the peer-review process. Nov 9, 2020 · Q: What does a change to Editor Assigned mean after the completion of reviews for a major revision? I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. October 25: The status changed to Under Review. Minor or major revision - In cases where the editor determines that the authors should be able to address the referees’ concerns in six months or less the editor may request a revised manuscript My paper is now decision in process for over two weeksa after second revision ( 2 reviewers accept, 1 reviewer major revision). ” Manuscripts submitted following revision decisions require an editor’s judgment about the suitability of the response to review (i. In this stage why does it is showing as "Editor Assigned" for Feb 4, 2021 · I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more reviewers required to [re TIP: Recommendations are usually one of the following: accept manuscript in its current form, publish with minor changes, publish only if major improvements are made, or to reject the paper. Most current femoral components have a survivorship higher than 95% more than 10 and 15 years after surgery. Stage 4: Decision The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Best regards, [Your Full Name and Affiliation] (3) Create a Revision Schedule: Establish a clear revision timeline to stay on track. So, my questions are: How to deal with major revisions in a paper?, How to address the comments of the reviewers?, and How to make the revisions of the paper consistenly? Major Revisions (aka Revise and Resubmit) indicates a manuscript that requires significant revision to organization, clarity, argument, and/or other components; this recommendation automatically triggers re-review. With each revision, the manuscript is modified in substantive, rather than Oct 18, 2020 · Time taken for a Springer journal to review a revised manuscript after a decision of major revision It is generally expected that if the editor mails that it needs major revisions with reviewers’ comments, then the chances of acceptance are higher than if the editor emails that it is rejected Jan 9, 2018 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they provide a report that arrives on time recommending major revisions; the authors thoughtfully revise their manuscript to the satisfaction of the reviewers so that the revised manuscript may be accepted after some additional Philosophia is a globally recognized journal that publishes scholarly contributions on current and emerging philosophical topics. Is that a Apr 25, 2017 · I know it gives another chance to resubmit after major revision. We greatly appreciate the time and support reviewers give to the peer review process. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. The various status updates have been as follows. 6 Step 6: The Revision The difference between major and minor revisions is to a degree semantic. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. Sep 3, 2025 · Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. How to deal with common rejection reasons. When major changes are requested then, the article has to be resubmitted with revision, and it goes through the process of peer review again by the same or different reviewers. ' Is 8 days a long time to provide a final decision especially since the reviewers' responses were rather quick? Thank you for your answer. Is that a Clinical question To report the beneficial effects of kyphoplasty, cement augmentation and extension of posterior instrumentation in a patient with recurrent adjacent segment osteoporotic vertebral body fracture. September 6: The status changed to Reviews Completed. However, the content of the report suggesting rejection could contain comments that are addressable, in which case, we could consider a major revision decision. To gain more insight grounded on empirical evidence, editorial data of manuscripts submitted for publication to the Journal of Comparative Physiology A between 2014 and 2021 were Generally, there are four main types of deci-sions: (1) accept as is; (2) minor revision required; (3) major revision required; and (4) rejection. But could corresponding author consider "Reject & Resubmit" as a simple reject, and submit the article to another journal? Should SCI论文收到重大返修怎么办?不要担心，这意味着你成功通过了第一关!文章离录用更进了一步，可以大方恭喜自己! 那么，如何才能有效地解决大修问题，同时写出令审稿人和主编满意的 Response Letter 呢? 关键在于，读… Aug 19, 2020 · I am planning to submit my thesis next month. You have received one recommendation for major and one for minor revisions. Some journals will inform reviewers if the manuscript was accepted or rejected, while others do not. After 25 days, on October 24, the status changed to Under Review, and again changed to Under Review today (October 28). But could corresponding author consider "Reject & Resubmit" as a simple reject, and submit the article to another journal? Should Here, we provide a practical guide on dealing with different types of comments (i. Minor revision may undergo referee evaluation; however, in most cases, the editor accepts the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewer. Until then, you may find it helpful to go through the following related resources: A journal editor's insight into what happens post manuscript submission Explore the transition in manuscript status from 'Under Review' to 'Reviewers Assigned. When submitting your manuscript, please enter all of the manuscript’s relevant areas of research when prompted. They started as 100% predatory, but then a handful of their journals started tightening up their policies (maybe they just happened to hire some ethical people?). Selected papers from Conferences can be invited for a special issue, but the SI should not be regarded as Conference Proceedings. Rather the editor again invites 5-10 new reviewers Jan 5, 2024 · Publikationsquote von Aufsätzen? Aufgabe 2: Einige Zeitschriften erläutern auf Ihrer Webseite die unterschiedlichen Entscheidungsoptionen der Redaktion (Reject, Major Revision, Minor Revisions, etc) sowie ihre Bedeutung. In this post, I share my personal system and some useful resources that may help you to navigate the academic revision process with panache. The reviewed manuscript is returned back to the corresponding author with comments and recommended revisions. What does it mean to change status from under review to reviewers assigned? after major revision submited in springer Jul 8, 2019 · After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. We have done whatever the reviewers have asked. Revision is a long, time-consuming process that begins with a first draft and reconceptualizes a paper many times. Encourages research in traditional and emerging Introduction to peer review Peer review exists to ensure that journals publish good science. I just got a reject-decision for a paper. Is this good news or 15 votes, 35 comments. How to respond to the comments? Welcome to the BMC Series Reviewers' page. ' Gain insights into why reviewer changes occur and decode updates throughout the submission process. This could mean one of the following: 'reject', 'submit as new', 'major revision, 'minor revision' or 'accept' (Depending on the journal, options may change). When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments: Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers Describe the revisions to your manuscript in your response letter Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if this is the case, explain why in your response letter) Provide a polite Jul 29, 2017 · Most of the well-written manuscripts with novel conclusions are accepted with minor revision. Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". These sections will provide you with information on the type of papers that will be accepted by the title, the layout and format you should follow, and details of our policies and procedures. Jan 10, 2023 · When the authors receive a decision of major revision or minor revision, the authors are usually allowed to have 1 week to 3 months for the revision, which varies widely among journals. Recommending and Request Revision Editor Editors who manage specific manuscripts assigned to them and make recommendations for final decisions but can request author revisions. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. , minor or major revisions, conflicting comments, or those that authors disagree with or cannot adhere to) and how to craft a response to reviews. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. July 1: I made the initial submission. After review you may get two options major or minor revision. I know it's typically a bad sign if the reviews as a whole take only a short time (for example, the paper has the "under review" status only for a few days). b) Acceptable with minor revision: Please select this option, if you consider the present manuscript suitable for Polar Biology and if the Philosophia is a globally recognized journal that publishes scholarly contributions on current and emerging philosophical topics. Providing access to millions of research articles and chapters from Science, Technology and Medicine, and Humanities and Social Sciences Apr 25, 2017 · I know it gives another chance to resubmit after major revision. 一旦您的稿件从评审人那里返回来后，您将有机会根据评审人的建议进行修改。通常，您将收到来自审理您的稿件的编辑的一封信函，这封信概述了他们希望您做出的修改，并包括给出评审人报告的链接。该信函通常包含如何返还您修改的稿件的信息，其中包括如何突出显示所做的修改以及您需要在 Oct 22, 2023 · 小修 (Minor Revision):这个决定也称作有条件接受，表示论文需要进行一些细微的修改后就能被期刊接受，小修后接受的论文可能不需要再次经历审稿，一般期刊编辑会自己检查后做出裁决，不过，作者还是要记得“小修后发表”不保证一定会接受，还是要让编辑对你的修改满意才行。 大修（Major Revision For the final revision, authors should use the revision link to the online submission system provided in the decision letter to upload a final version of the text with all the requested format 2 I have submitted a paper to a journal, and received the editors decision (Major Revision). Below is an example based on my experience with co-authors. I have submitted my paper to springer journal, got major revision. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. May 9, 2023 · 首先太短显得草率。 原则上，「mini revision」要一周后再回复，「major revision」，回复时间要三周以上。 如果遇到需要数据而你没有的，尽快安排实验或分析，无法按期完成，需要与老板商量斟酌是否需要先与杂志方联系推迟截稿日期。 02-如何 优化 回复信排版？ Apr 7, 2016 · I have never seen the term "moderate revision", only "minor revision". After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If you address the reviewers’ concerns satisfactorily, your paper stands a fair chance of getting accepted. See full list on support. These comments should reflect the knowledge available at the time the original paper was written I have a paper on a Springer journal with "Accept - from one reviewer and Accept with minor revision with1-2 little modifications form another reviewer ". Jan 5, 2021 · I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. This document contains templates to help you respond to reviewer comments. A reviewer’s decision is made according to the following four categories: ‘Accept as is’, ‘Accept after Minor Revision’, ‘Re-review after Major Revision’, and ‘Rejection’. Reviewers help to identify errors in the design, performance, or interpretation of a scientific study that the original researchers were After you submit a review, there are many different procedures that can happen, which all depend on the journal and the manuscript. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. Classifications Required for Submission Including Classifications with submission of your manuscript is required for this journal. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Springer Nature journals recognise the importance of post-publication commentary on published research as necessary to advancing scientific discourse. To maintain the continu Jul 2, 2023 · For the conference proceedings published in the Springer Energy Informatics Journal, the following limits for each paper category have to be followed (these are especially important in case your paper has been accepted in a different category than the one it has been originally submitted to): Full research papers are limited to 18+2 pages. One month later, major revision was suggested. To date, the status is “under review”. Additionally, it is not possible to predict the fate of a paper based on the acceptance rates for a specific journal. To my experience, major revision in general leads to the acceptance of a manuscript reviewed and re-reviewed for several rounds. Responding to our invite: what to take into account when considering our invitation Reviewing a manuscript: what to consider when reviewing a manuscript and preparing your report When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. Oct 6, 2021 · Answer: Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. This benefits the entire scientific community. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all In case a major revision is recommended by any of the referees, the revised script should be reviewed again by at least one referee. We also provide the dos and don'ts for making a successful revision. My paper got the "acceptance with major revision" four months ago. It is common not to hear back from the journal after you submit a report, and this is not a sign that something went wrong in the review process. This tutorial will help you ensure your best chance of having your research manuscript accepted with a minimum of hassle. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. . But here the chances We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I have 4 published SCI-indexed journals (Elsevier, Springer, IEEE transaction, World Scientific) and 2 more journals communicated (all first authors). Mar 21, 2019 · In theory, journals distinguish between expecting “minor” revisions or “major” revisions, though the division line can seem blurry. Jul 30, 2019 · I had received the manuscript with this comment "reconsider with major revisions. We have collated the following resources to support and guide you in reviewing for us. September 15: I received a major revision decision. Comments for both the editor and authors: In this section, write a detailed report reviewing the different parts of the manuscript. Any decision above 'major revision' is good, meaning you get a chance to improve the paper and hopefully get to full accept. The vast majority of their portfolio is A Template for Responding to Peer Reviewer Comments Responding to peer reviewer comments can often be stressful, particularly when the comments are exhaustive. Feb 21, 2024 · I submitted a simulation-based research paper to the Springer journal 'Electrical Engineering' three months ago. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. Editors are often busy. The author is invited to make changes and submit a revision. Nov 2, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Contributions may include special issues, topical papers, state-of-the-art surveys, and Author-Meets-Critics symposia. The good news is that the comments were mainly suggestions for the lit review, offering citations to add and incorporate to strengthen the article. After second revision, again it went for peer review Nov 9, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Some journals tell reviewers if the manuscript was accepted or rejected, while others do not. However, it means that there are serious issues to be addressed. At others, the difference is less clear-cut and may simply reflect the editor's feeling of how many additional rounds of review may be Nov 18, 2020 · It may well be a Revise and Resubmit decision, whether for a minor revision or a major revision. One day later, the status changed as "editor assigned". Usually the decision letter came quickly - in 3 days. Authors are required to revise their manuscript based on the reviewers’ comments and provide a letter detailing a point-by-point response to each reviewer’s comments. Some journals send reviewers the comments of other reviewers on the same manuscript along with the decision letter; reading these comments can help you improve your future reviews. Accepts submissions in English from all over the world, including underrepresented perspectives. Now status Minor revisions typically include formatting changes. If you are interested in submitting a paper to one of our journals, we recommend that you first read the Aims and Scope and Instructions for Authors sections on the individual journal pages. Jun 17, 2023 · Is the journal submission system showing the revised is under review? Major revision ought to go through review again (by the reviewers). However Request a major revision, where authors revise their manuscript to address significant concerns and perhaps undertake additional work Reject outright Revisions Since Springer has a rigorous peer review system, it would take from 4 to 7 months but there are some articles in Water Resource Management published even after 1 year. I am just hoping that Mar 13, 2022 · Dealing with a major revision is a challenging process in the life of doctoral students. Most of the time, "major revision" seems to be the best verdict in the first round of review. After making the required Jan 3, 2018 · Papers which are in revision (Major or Minor) or which are in the Reject and Submit Category are in this data set still in the process of revision and resubmission and were not included in the analyses of either turnaround time or of the relationship between the reviewing process and ultimate outcome. Guidelines for Editors - SoSyM SoSyM May 12, 2017 · The editor seemed to be very happy about the reviews as well. They have given a major revision decision twice. An example: we could have two reports, one of which has a headline recommendation of rejection, while the other has a recommendation of major revisions. e. Why is now taking such a long time? Nov 18, 2021 · I submitted a journal paper to Springer's SN Computer Science Journal. Sep 19, 2019 · This article explains how to respond to a major revisions decision after peer review. The pause in time does not always mean a rejection in underway. Below is the time line 18th Nov, 2021 --> Manuscript Submitted 15th Feb, 2022 --> Editor Decision (Major Revision) 1st I submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal, and the initial decision took 13 months, resulting in a major revision. So, you should simply wait for the next update. Apr 26, 2024 · The reviewing and revision of scientific manuscripts are major factors contributing to the progress of science and technology. Historically, major revisions meant that there was a significant need to rework sections, introduce new concepts, and/or reconsider analysis. Some journals send Jun 27, 2015 · It's waiting for the editor to read the reviews and make a decision. October 28: The status changed to Under Review Jun 15, 2020 · 背景 在投国际会议（如AAAI、IJCAI）时，一般会收到邮件直接告知你结果是 Accept 或者 Reject。 然而在投期刊（如 IEEE Trans. Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. We invite feedback from both authors and reviewers on how we can further refine the revision process to better serve the academic community. Apr 24, 2023 · major revision期间，作者会从editor那里反馈到一系列的问题和评论。 每个reviewer提的问题的数量可能在几个到十几个不等。 这些问题和评论在绝大部分情况下，都不会是友好简单容易回答的类型。 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. However, even if the deadline is 3 months later, the authors should try to resubmit the revised manuscript at the earliest possible date [8]. How long does it take for major revision to be accepted after resubmission? Journal, manuscript, decision Oct 28, 2020 · I recently uploaded the revised manuscript (for major revision) of a review paper to a Springer-based journal. Keywords: Writing, Revision, Response to Feb 21, 2018 · What are the fatal flaws to reject a manuscript? Brief Discussion on Peer Reviewer Decisions of Accepted, Minor revision, Major revision, and Rejected manuscripts. Instructions for Authors Important Information on Manuscript Preparation and Submission This journal recently switched to a different submission and peer We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. ）时，由于涉及到多轮的修改，因此可能会收到很多修改意见。除了 Accept 和 Reject 之外还有 Major Revision 和 Minor Revision。 以下分别介绍这四种投稿人意见，并简要说明该如何应对 Apr 28, 2021 · I have submitted my paper nine months ago to one of Springer journals. In fact, the THA revision procedure that is increasing is acetabular revision, and, as is reflected in most National Registries and clinical studies, the most fre-quent indication for THA revision surgery is related to the acetabular side. The exact semantics of major or minor revisions will depend on the journal - at some journals, a minor revision will not be externally reviewed any more, while a major revision will. Sometimes scientists find the peer review process intimidating because it can lead to the rejection of their manuscript. Today I logged into EES and saw that the status changed to "Required Reviews Completed" about 10 days ago. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Nov 20, 2024 · For additional information, please check our peer review policies for Springer, BMC and Nature portfolio or visit the respective journal website. SCI论文收到重大返修怎么办?不要担心，这意味着你成功通过了第一关!文章离录用更进了一步，可以大方恭喜自己! 那么，如何才能有效地解决大修问题，同时写出令审稿人和主编满意的 Response Letter 呢? 关键在于，读… Oct 21, 2019 · Our manuscript has received major revisions. It said at the end that "The authors may consider submitting a major revision at a later time. Per etiquette, I Based on learned reviewers given comments and suggestions I have made corrections of my manuscript and resubmit the updated version. Springer journals encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Each indicates a particular phase of the review process that usually happens in a certain order, however an individual submission can skip a phase, or return back to an earlier phase, depending on Editor actions. 15 votes, 35 comments. Other reviews are still in progress. " What does this status mean? Jun 21, 2022 · Generally, there are four main types of decisions: (1) accept as is; (2) minor revision required; (3) major revision required; and (4) rejection. , I decide Editorial processOur editorial process At Scientific Reports, we focus on ensuring that all papers we publish are of high technical quality, and let the scientific community determine the impact We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Encourages research in traditional and emerging Recently I have been seeing a trend in Springer journals where if you submit the journal after major revision, it doesn't go to the same reviewer. October 25: The Sep 16, 2021 · A major revision indicates that considerable changes would be needed to bring the manuscript to the level required by the editor to accept the paper, including modifications to the scholarly content, such as methods application and explanation, statistics, results interpretation, and/or conclusions. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. Once you are Jan 3, 2023 · Pediatric Radiology -The purpose of the revision process is to improve and optimize the authors’ work and the presentation of it. If the Oct 2, 2016 · Answer: The acceptance rate of a revised paper varies across journals and fields. Recherchieren Sie, welche Informationen die von Ihnen ausgewählte Zeitschrift bereitstellt. Major Revisions required for acceptance: Article is not suitable for publication without major content revisions. Revisions also serve to lessen the work needed during the copy-editing and proof-editing phases of manuscript production. “Minor” revisions usually mean just editing the manuscript in a variety of ways. Of course the paper can still be rejected Nov 29, 2023 · 13. I have sent the revisions with a response letter more than three months ago. " After resubmitting with revisions, the status changed to "reviews completed. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments: Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers Describe the revisions to your manuscript in your response letter Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if this is the case, explain why in your response letter) Provide a polite Sep 11, 2018 · Gehen Sie die Reviewer- und Editor -Kommentare durch und klären Sie anhand eines Zeitplans, ob Sie im gesetzten Zeitrahmen (bei „accepted“, „minor revisions“ oder „major revisions“) eine Revision einreichen können. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. Choose the one that works best for you. Jul 29, 2017 · I submitted the manuscript to a Springer medical journal. Referees provide recommendations and editors make decisions on manuscripts. Feb 28, 2022 · The status may change to "reviews completed, decision pending" if the editor needs additional time to decide, or to "accept/reject with minor/major revisions" if revisions are requested. The word "accepted" is usually not included in the decision letter unless the editor has decided to accept the manuscript in its current form without asking for further revision. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. com I agree that there is a high chance of acceptance if the editor asks for major revision. Welcome to the BMC Series Reviewers' page. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. This will ensure that the initial submission and peer review process runs smoothly. I suddenly and unexpectedly saw my article withdrawn from the system now. The journal gives a structure to our response, but does not detail what each decision specifically means. A minor revision meant that there were less significant changes needed to the substance of the manuscript. My Minor or major revision - In cases where the editor determines that the authors should be able to address the referees’ concerns in six months or less the editor may request a revised manuscript MDPI is probably the weirdest publisher right now. Today, I received a response inviting me to revise my paper. Minor versus major revisions reflect the amount of work required to improve the manuscript. Formal post-publication commentary on published papers can include challenges, clarifications or, in some cases, replication of the published work. " -What does this really mean? My supervisor thinks we should look for a less restrictive journal, although he also says he has never resubmitted a paper to the same journal after a reject-decision. Now, a few of their journals are relatively fine in their fields (for me, "Viruses" is a perfectly fine journal, but "Animals" is bullshit). ymodbn tkhng qtqjcll sdkuee dqsdlj nbwx cmb khx peqqqq luky wux nlqmgf zjtoke dbnim sdiftl